Now that Barack Obama has been US President for a little while, I find myself philosophising (if there is such a word) on the general subject of politics a fair bit.
One question that comes to mind is: what kind of a person strives to become a professional politician?
Truthfully, I know very little about the subject, and, for the most part, I am just thinking out loud here. I have some familiraity with the political process and politicians here in the US and in Russia. I suspect that in other countries the nature of the game, so to speak, is not much different anywhere else.
To briefly summarize my general views on politics, I will simply say that I think all politicians are bad people and if you find yourself in a company of one, make sure to keep close watch on your wallet. I fully expect to maintian this point of view until such day when I decide to go into politics. At that time, I will update my opinion to the following: all politicians are bad people except for me, so you might as well turn your wallet over to me of your own volition.
The natural question following that statement is whether I vote and if yes, why would I vote for someone I consider to be a bad person. An obvious answer is that I do not vote FOR politicians. I vote AGAINST them. In any political race I choose to vote in, I find the politician who, in my estimation, is likely to do the most harm and vote the person on the ballot with the best chance of beating him. In a nutshell: in absense of "good", I vote the lesser "evil".
I think that in order to want to become a politician, you have to have an incredible combination of vanity and appetite for power.
Now, I fully admit that some politicians probably got into politics because they wanted to make a difference and do good things (perhaps, this "wanting to make a difference" is simply a flip side of vanity). However, power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. No matter how well intentioned a particular politician may have been in the beginning of his career, after a couple of terms in office he will converge to the same state as every other politician: pure and unadulterated lust for power.
I started this post with Barack Obama and now I will use him as an example.
I recall a conversation I ahd on a table tennis forum, of all places, with a gentleman named Robert Blackwell. He is an owner of a table tennis equipment and promotion company called Killerspin. I do not know him well, but he is a successul businessman and clearly an intelligent guy. More importantly here, he is from Chicago and is, apparently, Obama's friend an neighbor. We had a brief exchange where we agreed to disagree. One thing that Robert said in trying to convince me to vote for Obama (that was during the campaign) was the following (I am paraphrasing): "Out of law school, he gave up being a millionare in order to help people". Presumably, he meant that Obama went into a law practice that dealt primarily with civil rights issues. If memory serves me right, Robert's business paid Barack Obama a retainer fee in that period of time.
Anyhow, the details of who paid what to who are not critical right now. What I found interesting is how differently people look at this. I suppose it all depends on your frame of reference.
I suspect that Obama got his graduate degree in "race baiting" during that exact period of time (it looks like that insight was confirmed by his treatment of that Cambridge, MA policeman).
When I look at Obama's political career, all I see is lust for power with little regard to anything else. Every public office he held was only a stepping stone. He used his time in Illinois Senate to set up runs at higher offices. He tried for House of Representatives: no luck. He regrouped and tried for US Senate: that worked. If you look at his track record in state senate: it does notappear that he showed up there a whole lot. Obama's US Senate track record is not much different: it was a launching pad for his presidential campaign. As a Senator, he did not show much itnerest in anything other than his Presidential campaign. I suppose we should consider ourselves lucky: if our "Race-Baiter-in-Chief" had another office to run for, we could end up with Joe Biden as a president.
As is we have got a man in the White House who is a professional campagner (and a very good one at that) and a masterful rabble rouser. All other skills a president needs he has to "learn on the job" so to speak.
That by itself is another confirmation of what is important to a politician: stayign in power. If Obama was primarily intersted in being a good president, wouldn't he at least try to prepare himself for running the executive branch of the government? It seems to me that governance and campaigning are not the same, but the again, I coule definitely be wrong.
Kolobok
P.S. No, I am not a racist. I believe that the best way to strop discrimination is to... stop discriminating. Screaming from the rooftops on how your forefathers have been wronged is not the way to go.
P.P.S I am not a "birther" or anything alogn those lines. Barack Obama got into White House fair and square. We, the People, put him there and We the People will have to deal with the consequences. I hope he does not screw things up too badly.